Showing posts with label biology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label biology. Show all posts

Saturday, February 28, 2015

The Creative Life of Nature


The story of Ernst Haeckel, a fascinating figure in the world of late-19th century biology.

This bio tells of his love for art, how that pulled him away from science, and how eventually he learned to integrate the two. It reminds me, in a way, of the story of William James. James' first professional education was as a painter; he apprenticed with William Morris Hunt, before deciding to pursue science (in medical training and research).

What is the relationship between science and art? "Pure" science studies the beauty that nature creates. Science could be call "art appreciation" writ large, were it not that in our culture "art appreciation" sounds like a trivial pursuit.

Human art is our attempt to make our own intentional contribution to nature's beauty, to participate in nature's creative life. As such, all our paintings and drawings, all our novels and stories, all our music, etc., are the smallest fraction of a fraction of the creative work of nature. This is an important perspective to take when judging the relationship between science and art. It is understandable that we disproportionately value our intentional creations, but in doing so we risk missing a lot. Particularly when the worlds of art and science are set in opposition, rather than seen as facets of the same project in the way that Haeckel came to see them.

Tuesday, February 17, 2015

Plant minds?


I am drawn to panpsychism, the idea that some form of mind pervades everything in the universe. Inanimate matter as well as everything we consider living. (There is the related idea from Whitehead: panexperientialism.) Drawn to it, though not convinced by it.

Staying focused on the living: if plants are considered to have minds or experience, this complicates the already complicated conversation around the ethical status of the non-human. Folks like Tom Regan have done as good a job as can be done extending Kantian deontology to animals. Pushed further, it breaks down. Infinite, absolute individual rights get us nowhere in a world where life has to consume life, and compete with life, in order to survive and propagate.

I've always felt there is a wisdom in trees. But I've been willing to consider that a mystical, imaginative fancy.  Maybe there's more to it?